Stephanie E. Grana

Partner

Leading Personal Injury Attorney in Richmond, VA

For more than 23 years, Stephanie Grana has fought for individuals and families in Virginia suffering from catastrophic injury and wrongful death as a top Richmond personal injury lawyer. When clients’ lives are turned upside down due to life-changing injuries or the death of a loved one due to someone else’s wrongful or negligent actions, they turn to Stephanie because she has a proven track record demonstrating her expertise and her passion for just compensation on behalf of the injured. In her years of practice, she has recovered more than 45 verdicts and settlements over $1 million.

Her professional integrity and ability to secure results for her clients has earned her an AV® Rating from Martindale-Hubbell, a leading lawyer rating directory. She has personally handled numerous high-profile, high-stakes personal injury cases, and has successfully guided her clients to victory. She has been selected to Best Lawyers in America® specifically for her excellent work in handling medical malpractice cases.

Stephanie has often been recognized for her incredible track record from the very beginning of her career. She was named a Super Lawyers® Rising Star in 2009, 2008, and 2007, and was selected by her peers to the Super Lawyers list every year since 2009 and has consistently appeared in its list of the top 100 lawyers in Virginia, top 50 female lawyers in Virginia and top 50 lawyers in Richmond.

She has received numerous awards and accolades from many other organizations and publications, such as the “Top 40 Under 40” award from Style Weekly (2008), the “Influential Women of the Year” award from Virginia Lawyers Weekly (2010), the Woman of Achievement award from the Metropolitan Richmond Women’s Bar Association (2012) and she has been inducted as a Virginia Law Foundation fellow.

Stephanie is deeply committed to service to her profession and has been voted by her peers to numerous leadership positions in both local and statewide organizations. She is currently the President of the Virginia Trial Lawyers Association, leading a 2000+ member voluntary association of trial lawyers from across Virginia. She is president-elect of the Virginia chapter of the American Board of Trial Advocates. She is a past-president of the Lewis F. Powell, Jr. America Inn of Court and the Metro Richmond Women’s Bar Association and is a member of the American Association of Justice. Stephanie was selected by The Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of Virginia to serve on the Virginia Model Jury Instruction Committee which writes and edits jury instructions for all Virginia cases. She is currently an active member of the Boyd-Graves Conference and the Virginia State Bar Future of Law Practice Study Committee. She served for 8 years as a member of the Virginia State Bar Disciplinary Committee for the 3rd District.

In addition to her trial work, Stephanie is often selected to teach other lawyers on various topics including medical malpractice, brain injury, trial practice and personal injury litigation at conferences around Virginia. Her expertise is routinely sought by lawyers who want to gain insight into the trial process, as well as how to secure larger verdicts and settlements for their clients.

Despite her decades of success for her clients and the awards and accolades from her peers, Stephanie is most proud to simply be Mom to her three amazing teenage children, Nicole, Garrett and Dakota. She is also incredibly appreciative to have a supportive husband, Scott who, as a lawyer, understands the demands on her time and that for Stephanie, being a trial lawyer is more than a job, it’s her calling.

Contact Stephanie: sgrana@virginiatrialfirm.com

Education

  • J.D., University of Richmond (1993), cum laude, Order of the Barristers, Moot Court Competition Finalist
  • B.A., University of Richmond (1990), magna cum laude, Phi Beta Kappa (graduated in 3 years)

Bar Admission

  • Virginia, 1993

Court Admissions

  • Virginia Supreme Court
  • 4th Circuit Court of Appeals
  • U.S. District Courts for the Eastern District of Virginia

Previous Experience

  • CantorArkema, P.C., Partner (2001-2009)
  • Shuford, Rubin & Gibney, P.C., Partner (1999-2001)
  • Bemberis & Grana, Partner (1998-1999)
  • Taylor & Schockmoehl, P.C., Associate (1994-1997)
  • Court of Appeals of Virginia, Judicial Clerk for Hon. Joseph E. Baker, Norfolk (1993-1994)

Honors

  • Virginia Law Foundation Fellow (2014)
  • MRWBA Women of Achievement Award (December 2012)
  • AV® Preeminent™ Peer Review Rated, Martindale-Hubbell’s highest rating for legal ability and ethical standards, Bar Register of Preeminent Woman Lawyers™ (2011)
  • American Lawyer Media and Martindale-Hubbell “Top Rated Lawyer” (2012)
  • Best Lawyers in America, in the category of Medical Malpractice (2009-present)
  • Virginia Super Lawyers® “Rising Star” (2007-2009), selected by Law & Politics
    • "Top 50 Women Virginia Super Lawyers" (2012-2016)
    • "Top 25 Richmond Area Super Lawyers" (2012)
    • "Top 100 Virginia Super Lawyers" (2012-2016)
    • "Top 25 Women Virginia Super Lawyers" (2011, 2010)
    • ”Top 50 Richmond Area Super Lawyers" (2016, 2015, 2014, 2012),
  • "Influential Women of the Year," selected by Virginia Lawyers Weekly (2010)
  • “Top 40 Under 40,” named by Style Weekly (2008)
  • ATLA’s National College of Advocacy, Advocate Status

Professional Associations

  • Virginia Trial Lawyers Association
    • President (2016-2017)
    • President-Elect (2015)
    • Executive Council Vice President (2012-present)
    • Executive Council (2010-present)
    • Board of Governors (1998-present)
    • Young Trial Lawyers Chair (1999-2000)
  • American Board of Trial Advocates (ABOTA)
    • President-Elect (2016-2017)
  • Virginia Model Jury Instruction Committee (2015-present)
  • Lewis F. Powell, Jr. American Inn of Court, President (2007-2009)
  • Metro Richmond Women’s Bar Association, President (2003-2004)
  • Boyd-Graves Conference Committee (2009-present)
  • Greater Richmond Bar Foundation, Board of Directors (2005-2007)
  • Etheridge Society
  • American Association of Justice (formerly Association of Trial Lawyers of America)
  • Litigation Counsel of America, Fellow
  • Virginia State Bar: Future of Law Practice Study Committee (2015-present), Third District Disciplinary Committee, (2005-July 2013, Chair 2012-13); Health Law Section; Committee on Women and Minorities in the Profession.
  • Richmond Bar Association
  • Chesterfield-Colonial Heights Bar Association
  • John Marshall American Inn of Court, Executive Committee (1999-2003)
  • National Association of Women Business Owners

Publications/Presentations

  • VSB CLE, Difficult Depositions, May 24, 2016 (Charlottesville).
  • VSB Litigation Section Spring CLE, The Art and Science of Mastering the Jury Trial, May 11, 2016 (Richmond).
  • VTLA 2016 Annual Convention, Case Law Update, March 31-April 3, 2016.
  • Virginia CLE, Best Trial Practices in Circuit Court: An Interactive Judges’ Forum for Richmond-Area Litigators, Pretrial and Trial Practices, September 29, 2015 (Richmond).
  • VTLA 2015 Annual Convention, Case Law Update, March 26-29, 2015.
  • NBI Seminar Moderator, As Judges See It: Top Mistakes Attorneys Make in Civil Litigation, December 2014 (Richmond).
  • VTLA Sources of Coverage, October 2014 (Fairfax).
  • VTLA 2014 Annual Convention, Tort Law Update, March 27-30, 2014.
  • VTLA Masters of Advocacy, Advocacy Seminar – “Zealous Advocacy v. Professionalism – Sanctions”, October 3, 2013 (Richmond).
  • VTLA 2013 Annual Convention, Tort Law Update, March 21-24, 2013.
  • VTLA Wrongful Death Retreat, February 22-23, 2013.
  • NBI Personal Injury Seminar: Standing on Ethical Ground, June 21, 2012 (Richmond).
  • NBI Judicial Forum: What Civil Court Judges Want You to Know, October 22, 2010.
  • VTLA Evidence Seminar, October 26, 2010 (Norfolk).
  • VTLA Advanced Auto Retreat Seminar, July 23, 2010.
  • The Use of Medical Literature in Trial, VTLA Journal, 2010.
  • VTLA Advanced Retreat on Pain: Understanding Pain, Proving Pain, November 2009.
  • LORMAN Seminar: HIPAA in Virginia for the Litigation Attorney & for the Health Care Provider, July 2009.
  • NBI Seminar: A Litigation Paralegal’s Guide to Case Management, January 2009.
  • VTLA Advanced Auto Retreat Seminar: The Medical Literature You Need to Win and How to get It In, July 2008.
  • VTLA Annual Convention: Use of 8.01-401.1 as a Sword and/or a Shield in Your PI Case, March 2008.
  • NBI Seminar: Obtaining the Best Settlement for Personal Injury Clients, February 2008.
  • VTLA Annual Paralegal Seminar: Personal Injury – Screening Intake and First Meeting, November 14, 2007.
  • Taking Control of Your Medical Care, V Magazine, November 2006.
  • Institute for Paralegal Education (IPE) Seminar:Countdown to Trial: A Crash Course in Trial Preparation for Paralegals, July 2007.
  • Interviewing your Potential Client – Hire or Not? VTLA Journal, Winter 2005.
  • Ensuring the Best Medical Treatment for Women and Their Children – Women’s Injury Law Center Worldly Women Workshop, Spring 2005. (Presented on 4 occasions)
  • IPE Seminar: Mastering the Trial Notebook in Virginia, December 2003.
  • “Hopping Through HIPAA’s Hoops Without Falling on Your Face . . . Sort Of,” VTLA Journal Practice Pointer, Fall 2003.
  • IPE Seminar: Trial Preparation from Start to Finish For Virginia Paralegals, June 2003.
  • Editor, Collateral Source, Medicaid/Medicare Liens & Amounts ‘Written Off, October 1997 for the Etheridge Society.
  • Medical Malpractice in Virginia - Overview published in VTLA seminar materials: Welcome to the Real World - A New Lawyer's Guide to Litigation, March 1996.

Community Involvement

  • Community Brain Injury Services – Board Member (2013 - present)
  • Legacy Competition Dance Team – Parent Committee (2013 - present)
  • Virginia Synchronized Swimming Association, Level IV Judge, Richmond Masters Synchronized Swimming Team (1995-2003)
  • Phi Beta Kappa Alumni Association, President (2000-2001)
  • University of Richmond Spider Club Athletic Association, Board Member (1998-2001)
  • Making Strides Against Breast Cancer Walk – Firm’s Team Captain (2003-present)
  • Medical Malpractice Verdict

    $9 Million

    In this medical malpractice case, a 10 year-old boy suffering from an intellectual disability and cerebral palsy due to a hypoxic ischemic brain injury at birth, as a result of a delayed decision to perform a C-section, was awarded $9,077,500. $5,500,000 in compensatory damages plus $3,577,500 in interest was awarded by a jury after 4 days of testimony.

    (Stephanie Grana, Elliott Buckner, Irv Cantor)

    Read moreless
  • Auto Accident

    $5 million

    The husband-driver of the motorcycle, age 48, suffered severe left leg injuries resulting in an above the knee amputation. He was in excellent health and extremely active prior to the crash. He suffers from intermittent phantom pain and depression. The wife-passenger, age 47, suffered a fractured clavicle, fractured great toe, tendon injury to her knee and a large laceration of her lower leg. She suffers from significant lost mobility, pain and anxiety. The plaintiffs are a very attractive couple, who had been married for just over one year at the time of the crash. The severe injuries the couple suffered in the crash were obviously life-altering in nature. Plaintiff’s counsel conducted a mock trial and performed a survey of demographic and jury verdict research prior to settling the case. The case settled subsequent to a mediation.

    Type of Action: Motorcycle collision

    Style of Case: Confidential

    Court: Spotsylvania County Circuit

    Award or Settlement: Settlement

    Amount: $5,000,000

    Amount of Specials: Husband; driver - $116,265.14 in past medical bills, $737,472.16 future medical bills, and $381.665.50 in past and future wage loss. Wife,; passenger - $64,815.87 in past medical bills and $25,116.25 in future medical bills, and $10,316.80 in past wage loss.

    Attorneys for plaintiff: Stephanie E. Grana, Irvin V. Cantor, and Elliott M. Buckner, Cantor Stoneburner Ford Grana & Buckner, P.C., Richmond, Va.

    Read moreless
  • Medical Malpractice

    $4 Million

    This was a legal malpractice lawsuit arising out of a medical malpractice claim. Plaintiff was an active and athletic 13-year old when she was diagnosed with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. She sought treatment from Dr. Susan Atkins, a Richmond pediatric orthopaedist, who recommended surgery. Dr. Atkins was to perform a posterior spinal fusion with instrumentation and bone allograft. This surgery required the placement of metal “hooks” down the left and right side of the thoracic vertebrae followed by the manipulation of the spine to permit the attachment of metal rods to straighten the spine. During the surgery, Dr. Atkins dissected the tissue, exposed the vertebrae, and placed the first thoracic hook at T-4. Almost immediately, the monitors to the Plaintiff’s lower extremities lost signal . Dr. Atkins immediately removed the hook, performed a wake-up test with a negative result, aborted the surgery, and closed the back incision. From that moment, the Plaintiff suffered permanent incomplete paraplegia whereby she lost all bladder and bowel function and virtually all use of her lower extremities. She will be permanently wheelchair bound.

    The Plaintiff and her parents hired a Washigton DC law firm to pursue her medical malpractice claim. The firm accepted the case, obtained expert support for the case, and asked an associate to draft a Complaint. The firm filed the medical malpractice Complaint in the Richmond Circuit Court four days before the statute of limitations ran. The case was styled: “Richard Gilbert and Rosie Lee Gilbert, Individually and on behalf of their daughter, Sarah Gilbert, a minor.” Defense counsel moved to dismiss the Complaint on the grounds that the real party in interest (the minor) did not bring the action. The law firm filed a second case styled: “Sarah Gilbert, by her parents and next friends Richard and Rosie Lee Gilbert; and Richard and Rosie Lee Gilbert, individually.” The trial court dismissed case number one because of the improperly named plaintiff. The trial court dismissed case number two because it was filed correctly but was filed after the statute of limitations had run. For two years, the law firm attempted various procedural options to reverse the decision to no avail. A Petition for Appeal to the Virginia Supreme Court was denied.

    The young Plaintiff ultimately brought this legal malpractice action against the law firm. Plaintiff intended to call esteemed trial attorney, Thomas E. Albro, as a legal expert witness. However, at trial, the Defendants admitted liability for the law firm on the grounds that the Complaint had been erroneously filed but contended that the senior partner was not individually liable because he had delegated the drafting of the Complaint to the Virginia associate in his office and was not directly involved. The trial court denied that motion.

    The trial also involved the presentation of the entire underlying medical malpractice case. Plaintiff called Dr. David P. Roye, a pediatric orthopedic surgeon, who confirmed injury at the level of T4 precisely where the hook was placed and further testified that Dr. Atkins breached the standard of care by placing the hook in a manner that blocked the circulation to the spinal cord and/or actually caused the hook to come in contact with her spinal cord. Plaintiff called Dr. Wilbur L. Smith, a pediatric radiologist, who testified that the ischemia occurred at the level of T3/T4 and that he was certain that the damage occurred at the time of placement of the hook. He opined that the hook cut off the blood supply to the cord but did not strike the cord.

    Defendants called Dr. Allen L. Carl, a pediatric orthopedic surgeon, to testify that Dr. Atkins did not breach the standard of care, and that the mere fact that the blood vessels to the cord were occluded resulting in cord death did not implicate negligence. Defendants also called Dr. Jerome A. Barakos, a neuroradiologist, who testified that that he was certain that the cord had not been struck, that vessels are occluded all the time in such surgery, and that he believed the damage was caused by a stroke in the spinal cord at the same level as the hook placement. Defense counsel argued that the Plaintiff failed to prove the precise mechanism of injury and/or that such injury was caused by a breach of the standard of care.

    Plaintiff presented a number of damages witnesses concerning the implications of the paralysis and presented a Life Care Plan through Betty S. Overbey, R.N. in the amount of $2,600,000. The jury deliberated for 90 minutes and returned a verdict for the Plaintiff for $4,000,000. Defendants requested the opportunity to file post-verdict motions.

    Type of case: Legal malpractice lawsuit

    Name of case: Sarah E. Gilbert v Paulson & Nace, PLLC and Barry J. Nace, Esq.

    Court: Richmond Circuit Court

    Tried before: Jury

    Verdict or settlement: Verdict

    Date of verdict: September 27, 2013

    Special damages: $2.6 million life care plan

    Demand: $1,700,000

    Offer: $260,000

    Amount: $4,000,000

    Attorneys for plaintiff: H. Aubrey Ford and Stephanie E. Grana (Richmond) – Cantor Stoneburner Ford Grana & Buckner

    Attorneys for defendant: John O. Easton and Carol T. Stone (Fairfax) – Jordan Coyne & Savits

    Plaintiff’s experts: Thomas E. Albro, Esq. (legal) ; Dr. David P. Roye (pediatric orthopaedic surgery) ; Dr. Wilbur L. Smith (pediatric radiology) ; Betty S. Overbey (life care plan)

    Defendant’s experts: Gary B. Mims, Esq. (legal) ; Dr. Allen L Carl (orthopaedic surgeon) ; Dr. Jerome A. Barakos (neuroradiology)

    Read moreless
  • Medical Malpractice

    $4 Million

    The plaintiff, a 34 year old, young mother, was scheduled for a repeat C-section, but went into labor 9 days early on August 1, 2010. Labor progressed quickly. She delivered a healthy baby girl vaginally, with no complications.

    After delivery, plaintiff complained of sharp, abdominal pain and 10/10 pain unrelieved by morphine. Moderate bleeding was then noted. The obstetrician came bedside and decided to perform a manual exploration and curette procedure. After this procedure, he ruled out uterine scar rupture, which is a risk for any patient who delivers vaginally following a previous C-section delivery (“VBAC”), and continued to treat plaintiff for uterine atony or a loss in tone of the uterus. No blood products were ordered or transfused and the plaintiff was not taken to the operating room for exploratory surgery. For the next 1 ½ hours, plaintiff was consistently hypotensive (low blood pressure) and tachycardia (fast pulse) and the two nurses who remained bedside noted “moderate” bleeding. The obstetrician acknowledged that he was kept apprised and a blood draw revealed lower hemoglobin and hematocrit values than prior to delivery, but not abnormal for a postpartum patient. When the obstetrician came bedside, the plaintiff was becoming restless and short of breath. She coded within minutes thereafter.

    After resuscitation, the plaintiff received her first blood transfusion and a second obstetrician took over her care. For the next 4 ½ -5 hours, the plaintiff was monitored closely and received 7 units of packed red blood cells and 7 units of fresh frozen plasma. Her blood draws revealed low hemoglobin and hematocrit values and her bleeding was noted “off and on” during this entire time frame. This bleeding was contested by defendant and their experts. When the plaintiff was finally taken to the operating room for a hysterectomy, a procedure that plaintiff’s experts testified should have been performed hours earlier; she coded again and had to be resuscitated. The surgery continued and by the time of completion, the plaintiff had received a total of 14 units of packed red blood cells and 14 units of fresh frozen plasma, along with other products. Following the performance of the hysterectomy, the plaintiff had no further bleeding. Plaintiff suffered 2 additional codes while in the hospital.

    The hysterectomy operative report noted a uterine scar “defect” from the prior C-section scar. Defendant and their experts argued for the first time at trial that plaintiff’s injury was a prior uterine scar “dehiscence” and not a complete rupture and that conservative measures were appropriately administered prior to the hysterectomy or treatment of “last resort.” Plaintiff’s experts argued that the defect was referred to as a prior uterine scar “rupture” or “dehiscence” interchangeably in the medical records and was the source of plaintiff’s bleeding and subsequent hemorrhagic shock.

    Plaintiff remained on a ventilator for 9 days, suffering from renal failure and adrenal insufficiency. Plaintiff slowly improved, but she has no memory of giving birth to her daughter or the events thereafter. Upon discharge, the plaintiff had to be transferred to a rehab facility to re-learn how to walk, talk, walk up stairs, write and regain her strength to hold her children. She remained on dialysis for another month. 3 months later, the plaintiff was able to return to her job as high school biology and anatomy teacher.

    Approximately 9 months later, the plaintiff learned that her kidney injury was permanent. She was evaluated and placed on the national list for a kidney transplant. A little over 1 year after the delivery and the events giving rise to the lawsuit, the plaintiff underwent a kidney transplant from a cadaver donor. Plaintiff recovered and returned to her job 3 months later.

    Due to her age, plaintiff’s experts testified that she will require at least 2 additional kidney transplants. For life, she needs routine medical follow-up, is a risk for various complications related to the transplant and remains on daily immunosuppressant medications – taking 22 pills per day. Plaintiff is a wonderful lady and a “fighter” and made an excellent witness before the jury.

    This was a no offer case. After 5 days of trial, the jury awarded the plaintiff 4 million dollars. The judgment, as reduced to the statutory cap by the Court, has been satisfied.

    Plaintiff thanks Amicus Visual Solutions for their assistance at trial.

    Type of action: Medical Malpractice case involving a uterine scar rupture and permanent kidney loss to a young mother of two daughters

    Style of case: Sally S. Arbogast v. Summit Health Care, Inc.

    Court: County of Chesterfield Circuit Court

    Judge: Honorable Steven C. McCallum

    Verdict or settlement: Jury verdict

    Amount: $4,000,000.00 (reduced to the cap of $2,000,000.00 pursuant to Virginia Code § 8.01-581.15)

    Amount of specials: $731,787,14 - past medicals and lost wages, $1,671,851.90 – life care plan

    Attorneys for plaintiff: Irvin V. Cantor, Stephanie E. Grana,and Elliott M. Buckner, Cantor Stoneburner Ford Grana & Buckner, P.C., Richmond, VA

    Plaintiff’s experts: Obstetricians, Critical Care Surgeon, Transplant Surgeon, Nephrologist, Life Care Planner

    Defendant’s experts: Obstetricians, Hematologist/Oncologist

    Read moreless
  • Legal Malpractice

    $4 Million Jury Verdict

    The plaintiff, a 13-year old girl, was recommended for surgery after being diagnosed with adolescent scoliosis. During the surgical procedure, neurological monitors to the plaintiff’s lower extremities lost all signals and the plaintiff suffered from permanent partial paraplegia as a result.

    The plaintiff’s parents took legal action, hiring a law firm in Washington, DC to represent their case. However, they encountered problems when the medical malpractice lawsuit was dismissed on grounds that the complaint improperly named the plaintiff. Filed only four days before the statute of limitations ran out, the case had to be refiled. However, it was again dismissed; this, time because it was filed past the date of the statute of limitations.

    After the plaintiff’s Petition for Appeal to the Virginia Supreme Court was denied, the family hired Aubrey Ford to take over the case. Under Attorney Ford’s representation, the plaintiff and her family were ultimately awarded $4,000,000 and the verdict was reduced to the Virginia medical malpractice cap.

    Read moreless
  • Wrongful Death

    $2.975 Million

    Wrongful death case.

    (Irv Cantor, Stephanie Grana, Elliott Buckner)

    Read moreless
  • Wrongful Death

    $2.85 Million

    Wrongful death case.

    (Irv Cantor, Stephanie Grana, Elliott Buckner)

    Read moreless
  • Brain Injury

    $2.8 Million

    n 2006, the plaintiff, a 13-year-old teenage boy, was injured when the automobile in which he was a passenger was struck by an SUV that failed to stop at a stop sign.

    The plaintiff was taken by ambulance to the hospital, where it was discovered that he had suffered a head injury with an epidural hematoma, requiring a craniotomy to evacuate the blood. The surgery was successful and the plaintiff was released from the hospital after a 3-day admission.

    The plaintiff was able to return to school, ultimately completing his middle school and high school without disruption. However, the plaintiff struggled throughout his schooling with headaches, sleep difficulties, tinnitus, and difficulties with concentration, attention and memory. He also had occasional lapse spells, where he experienced short periods of time where he lost awareness of his surroundings. Notwithstanding these difficulties, the plaintiff was able to complete high school with a grade point average of over 3.0.

    After high school, the plaintiff matriculated to VCU, where he completed his first two years. His grades at VCU have been markedly lower than his high school grades. Plaintiff’s experts explained that when the plaintiff left the structured environment of high school for the more challenging environment of college, the plaintiff was unable to adapt satisfactorily due to his multiple cognitive deficits.

    Plaintiff’s physicians ordered numerous EEG studies because of their suspicion that he was suffering from a complex partial seizure disorder. The EEG studies were largely unremarkable, except for subtle abnormalities noted on a digital dense - array EEG and a subsequent sleep deprived EEG. The plaintiff also underwent a PET Scan and Diffusion Tensor Imaging (“DTI”) study that showed some evidence of persistent brain dysfunction.

    The defendant’s experts contested the extent of the plaintiff’s brain injury, emphasizing plaintiff’s successful academic record as evidence of his functional abilities. The defendant’s neuroradiologist disputed the findings of the plaintiff’s neuroradiologist regarding the PET and DTI studies, stating that there was no detectable asymmetry in either the white matter tracts of the DTI or the metabolic activity of the PET Scan. The defense experts also disputed that the plaintiff would need any of the items included in the Life Care Plan.

    The parties settled the case at a mediation conducted prior to trial. The plaintiff’s settlement proceeds were paid in cash and a structured settlement, with an estimated lifetime payout of almost $4,500,000.

    Type of case: Traumatic Brain Injury by Auto Accident

    Name of case: Confidential

    Court: York County Circuit Court

    Verdict or settlement: Settlement

    Amount of settlement: $2,800,000

    Date of settlement: June 21, 2013

    Special damages: Medical expenses: $145,305; Life care plan total: $901,431

    Attorneys for plaintiff: Irvin V. Cantor, Stephanie E. Grana,and Elliott M. Buckner, Cantor Stoneburner Ford Grana & Buckner, P.C., Richmond, VA, and Michael Maguire, Yorktown, VA

    Plaintiff’s experts: Neurosurgeon, Neurologist, Neuropsychiatrist, Neuropsychologist, Neuroradiologist, Life Care Planner

    Defendant’s experts: Neurologist, Neuropsychologist, Neuroradiologist

    Read moreless
  • Medical Malpractice

    $2.7 Million

    Plaintiff was arrested for public intoxication and taken to a regional jail, to be released upon his own recognizance once sober. Several hours after being booked and while still in custody, plaintiff began experiencing seizures consistent with alcohol withdrawal. Over the course of approximately two hours, guards and nurses with the jail witnessed plaintiff undergo multiple seizures of sustained duration that resulted in, among other things, incoherency, bleeding from the mouth, and loss of bowel function. Despite plaintiff’s deteriorating medical condition 911 was not called until after a magistrate agreed to sign a release order. Upon arrival at the hospital, plaintiff suffered a heart attack as a result of severe metabolic acidosis caused by his seizures and alcohol withdrawal, which in turn resulted in oxygen deprivation and, ultimately, permanent hypoxic encephalopathy.

    (Mark Dix, Elliott Buckner, Irv Cantor, Scott Bucci, Stephanie Grana)

    Read moreless
  • Wrongful Death

    $2.4 Million

    The decedent was a registered nurse, wife and mother of two who fell on the steps at a commercial facility. The plaintiff alleged that the steps were not built according to the building code, such that the defendants were negligent per se. Plaintiff further alleged the defendants were negligent per se. Plaintiff further alleged the defendants were negligent pursuant to common law because they had prior notice of defects in the steps, which had not been properly repaired. The cause of the fall was complicated by the decedent’s death, since she could not testify. The plaintiff planned to prove proximate cause through two eyewitnesses who saw the fall. Statements of the decedent to those witnesses at the time of her fall, as well as in her own handwriting in medical records, was admissible under the Dead Man’s Statue as an exception to the hearsay rule.

    The primary issue in the case involved whether the decedent died as a result of the fall. At the time of the fall, she suffered a trimalleolar fracture of her ankle, which was surgically repaired and casted. She was then non-weight bearing and essentially immobile for two months during the healing process.

    After the decedent had her cast removed, she underwent out-patient surgery to have the screws removed and began physical therapy. Eight days after the second surgery, and approximately nine weeks after her fall, the decedent became suddenly critically ill and died. No autopsy was performed.

    The plaintiff claimed the decedent died from the pulmonary embolus, caused by a deep vein thrombosis which had formed in her leg as a result of her injury and post-surgery immobility.

    The defendants claimed that the decedent died as a result of cardiac arrest unrelated to her fall. They contended that the decedent had risk factors for cardiac disease, primarily because she was a diabetic and obese.

    Causation was strongly contested. Decedent’s treating physicians including the ER doctor, her two family physicians, an internist who treated her during the hospitalization at the time of her first surgery and the orthopedist who performed her two surgeries, testified that the decedent died as a result of a pulmonary embolus caused by her initial injuries from her fall. In addition, the plaintiff had two independent cardiologists and one independent orthopedist review all of the records and depositions in the case. The three experts agreed that the decedent had died as a result of a pulmonary embolus caused by her injuries, resulting treatment and immobility after the fall.

    The defendants retained a cardiologist an orthopedist and a pulmonologist, who opined that the decedent had died from an unrelated heart attack.

    Depositions were taken from all of the decedent’s health care providers and experts, and from the factual witnesses and family members who witnesses the decedent’s fall and who were aware of her condition leading up to and at the time of her death. Rescue squad personnel also provided important factual information critical to the diagnosis of pulmonary embolus being the cause of death.

    The case was ultimately resolved at the mediation approximately two months prior to trial.

    Type of Action: Slip & fall

    Injuries alleged: Wrongful death

    Special damages: $73,668 in medical bills; $10,491 in funeral bills; $788,081 in contested loss of earnings and loss of services to the family

    Verdict or Settlement: Settlement

    Amount: $2,400,000

    Attorneys for plaintiff: Irvin V. Cantor, Stephanie E. Grana and Elliott M. Buckner, Richmond, Va.

    Read moreless
  • Wrongful Death

    $2.3 Million

    The Decedent was driving an automobile that was in the process of making a left turn into a driveway when the defendant, driving a tractor-trailer, struck the automobile as the tractor-trailer was attempting to pass the automobile. The tractor-trailer initiated its pass around the automobile in a passing zone, but the actual impact between the vehicles was in a no-passing zone.

    Liability was hotly contested between the parties. The defense contended that the Decedent was contributorily negligent, claiming that he failed to give a visible turn signal as required by Virginia Code Sections 46.2-848 and 849 based primarily upon the testimony of an eyewitness on the side of the road that the Decedent activated his turn signal only a short distance (less than the required 100 feet) from where he initiated his turn.

    The Decedent died at the scene of the crash. The statutory beneficiaries of the Decedent were his wife and two adult sons. The Decedent was an appliance repair technician.

    Type of case: Wrongful death

    Name of case: Confidential

    Verdict or settlement: Settlement

    Amount of settlement: $2,300,000

    Attorneys for plaintiff: Irvin V. Cantor, Elliott M. Buckner, Stephanie E. Grana, Cantor Stoneburner Ford Grana & Buckner, P.C., Richmond, Va.

    Plaintiff’s experts: Economist, Accident Reconstructionist

    Defendant’s experts: Economist, Accident Reconstructionist

    Read moreless
  • Wrongful Death

    $2.2 Million

    Wrongful death of 70 year old in tractor- trailer collision.

    (Irv Cantor, Stephanie Grana, Elliott Buckner)

    Read moreless
  • Medical Malpractice

    $2 Million

    Several hours after undergoing a laparoscopic cholecystectomy, the patient, a 33 year old man, who suffered from sleep apnea, was found apneic, with his CPAP not affixed to his face. The patient was unable to be resuscitated and ultimately died. The plaintiff’s allegations included, among other things, failure to provide proper post surgical care to a sleep apnea patient, failure to adequately monitor the patient, and failure to timely and adequately resuscitate the patient.

    The case settled for $2,000,000 (under a $2,000,000 medical malpractice cap).

    (Irv Cantor, Stephanie Grana)
    Read moreless
  • Medical Malpractice

    $2 Million

    Verdict in medical malpractice case for a bladder injury to a woman that was caused by mismanaged catheter care, reduced to Virginia’s statutory cap.

    (Lewis Stoneburner, Stephanie Grana)

    Read moreless
  • Medical Malpractice

    $2 Million

    Plaintiff, a fifteen year old male, with mild persistent asthma, was negligently diagnosed with cystic fibrosis (“CF”) and pancreatic insufficiency (“PI”) at the age of five and treated for the diseases until shortly before his thirteenth birthday. His diagnoses were never properly confirmed by available testing. After seven and a half years of treatment, Defendant’s physician employee conducted proper testing and reversed the diagnoses.

    Cystic fibrosis is an incurable disease which results in progressive pulmonary and pancreatic dysfunction, sterility and an early death. The average life expectancy for CF was approximately 30 years old at the time of the plaintiff’s diagnosis. The plaintiff learned from a young age that he would undergo daily treatment, eventual bilateral lung transplants, sterility and a premature death. Plaintiff put on evidence that the child underwent over 3,000 hours of unnecessary chest physiotherapy, which was administered everyday. He ingested almost 40,000 doses of pancreatic enzymes, underwent 26 unnecessary chest x-rays, consumed 23 different types of medications, in addition to enduring other medically invasive treatments including a bronchoscopy, deep throat cultures, blood draws and intravenous administration of unnecessary antibiotics. In addition, the plaintiff called a child psychologist who testified as to the psychological impact of the diagnosis, and its reversal, on the child.

    Two of the Defendant’s physician employees testified as adverse witnesses for the Plaintiff. The doctor who reversed the diagnosis testified as the Plaintiff’s first witness. He conceded that the child had never been properly tested, had mild symptoms consistent with asthma, and that the testing he performed definitively ruled out CF and PI. The Plaintiff also called adversely the current Director of the MCV CF Center, who agreed with the reversal of the diagnosis.

    The case was defended on both the standard of care and causation. The Defendant relied on the fact that the plaintiff had some initial test results which raised the suspicion of CF and mild symptoms that could have been consistent with asthma or CF. Under these circumstances, the Defendant contended treatment was reasonable. In terms of causation, the Defendant argued the plaintiff suffered no known side effects from unnecessary medications and therapies and should be relieved by the fact that he did not have the diseases.

    Type of Action: Medical Malpractice

    Injuries alleged: Misdiagnosis resulting in negligent treatment and emotional harm

    Name of Case Physicians: Johnson v. MCV Associated

    Verdict or Settlement: Jury Verdict

    Date: March 22, 2012

    Judge: Hon. Melvin R. Hughes. Jr.

    Amount: $2,000,000

    Last offer $210,000

    Attorneys for Defendant: Kimberly Satterwhite, Tanner Smith

    Attorneys for plaintiff: Lewis T. Stoneburner, Bellamy Stoneburner, Cantor Stoneburner Ford Grana & Buckner, P.C., Richmond, Va.

    Read moreless
  • Brain Injury

    $2 Million Settlement

    Automobile accident case involving a brain injury suffered by our client.

    (Irv Cantor, Aubrey Ford, Stephanie Grana, Elliott Buckner)

    Read moreless
  • Auto Accident

    $2 Million

    Automobile accident case involving a brain injury suffered by our client.

    (Irv Cantor, Aubrey Ford, Stephanie Grana, Elliott Buckner)

    Read moreless
  • Wrongful Death

    $1.95 Million

    Verdict in wrongful death case.

    (Irv Cantor, Elliott Buckner, Stephanie Grana)

    Read moreless
  • Brain Injury

    $1.95 Million

    Plaintiff, a 53 year old man, had previously suffered an odontoid fracture in 2001 which required a spinal fusion from C1 to C5. He had done well and was employed as a supervisor for 30 years. When he developed some difficulty walking with secondary bilateral leg weakness, he was admitted into the hospital by his neurosurgeon for a re-do occiput to C5 instrumentation and fusion. The anesthesia pre-procedure consult noted specific concerns for anesthesia including severely limited neck motion due to cervical traction in neutral position and a limited mouth opening. A subsequent pre-procedure consult note indicated a more normal assessment. Given the plaintiff’s presentation to the hospital, his symptoms, the requirement of cervical traction to ameliorate those symptoms and his past surgical history, plaintiff’s experts were of the opinion that the first evaluation was more accurate and the plaintiff needed a fiberoptic intubation. Prior to the commencement of the surgery, the anesthesia providers provided some sedation while the monitor and oxygen were applied. A transtracheal block was performed. Two minutes later, the plaintiff was induced with Lidocaine and Propofol. The combination of these drugs can cause a patient to become apneic which can normally be cared for. The records noted that the plaintiff’s mask ventilation was difficult and that he had a period of apnea following ventilation within minutes. Two oral attempts were then made with a fiberoptic bronchoscope, but were unsuccessful. It was noted that the plaintiff remained spontaneously breathing, but required pressure support via mask between attempts.

    Despite these noted difficulties, it was next decided to administer Rocuronium to assist with the ventilation/intubation. Rocuronium is an intermediate-acting muscle relaxant, which is not reversible for at least 20 to 30 minutes. Essentially, the plaintiff was paralyzed at this point and could no longer breathe for himself. The anesthesia providers no longer had the option of being able to immediately awaken their patient. A third attempt at fiberoptic intubation was unsuccessful. The plaintiff then became difficult and then, impossible to mask ventilate with two providers and an oral airway. The next maneuver attempted was a direct laryngoscopy, but failed. An attempt at supraglottic airway was made, but failed as well. The plaintiff was now bradycardic while still maintaining a blood pressure. An angiocatheter was placed through the neck into his trachea and oxygen was insufflated through the catheter. This helped for a short period of time, but became clotted and no further oxygenation was possible. At this time, the anesthesia providers decided to place a tracheostomy. An incision was made in the plaintiff’s neck and dissected down to the trachea. Unfortunately, multiple attempts made to place the tracheostomy were unsuccessful. An ENT physician then entered the operating room to further assist. The plaintiff became more bradycardic and eventually, no palpable pulses were felt. CPR commenced and he received approximately 4 minutes of chest compressions. The plaintiff was finally intubated via direct laryngoscopy while the ENT was working on the tracheotomy. Immediately after the patient was successfully intubated, his oxygen saturations returned to more normal levels. Shortly thereafter, the providers were able to re-establish a cardiac rhythm and blood pressure. The neurosurgeon deemed that his patient was grossly unstable from a pulmonary and cardiovascular standpoint the planned neurosurgical procedure was aborted.

    Despite various medical interventions that followed, the plaintiff remained neurologically devastated and did not have any spontaneous movement or response to painful stimuli. An EEG was performed and noted a pattern typically seen following anoxic injury after cardiac arrest, suggestive of a poor prognosis. Plaintiff’s brain imaging was indicative of a global hypoxic-ischemic injury. He was taken for a tracheostomy and PEG tube placement. Plaintiff’s experts were of the opinion that the induction of anesthesia and intubation sequence did not meet the standard of care directly resulting in the plaintiff’s permanent injuries.

    After more than a month in the hospital, the plaintiff was discharged to a long-term care facility where he remains today. Although he has been weaned from the ventilator, the plaintiff remains unable to care for himself independently, unable to walk and unable to communicate verbally. He is currently being cared for by his parents and 5 siblings who all live locally. At the time of settlement, less than two years after the date of injury, the plaintiff’s incurred medical bills totaled almost one million dollars.

    Type of action: Medical malpractice case involving permanent anoxic brain injury requiring a lifetime of care.

    Injuries alleged: Permanent anoxic brain injury.

    Court: Settlement

    Verdict or settlement: Settlement (pre-suit)

    Amount: $1,950,000.00

    Amount of specials: $1,000,000.00

    Date of settlement: November 2015

    Attorneys for plaintiff: Stephanie E. Grana, Irvin V. Cantor, and Elliott M. Buckner, Cantor Stoneburner Ford Grana & Buckner, P.C., Richmond, VA, Jeffrey A. Breit, Breit Drescher Imprevento, P.C., Virginia Beach,VA

    Read moreless
  • Medical Malpractice

    $1.95 Million

    Medical malpractice case.

    (Irv Cantor, Stephanie Grana, Elliott Buckner)

    Read moreless
  • Medical Malpractice

    $1.7 Million

    Plaintiff was an independent and healthy 27 year old who was injured in a car accident in December 2011 and underwent surgery for multiple orthopedic injuries. Plaintiff tolerated the surgery well. At the close of the surgery, Plaintiff exhibited airway difficulties following extubation by the CRNA. Plaintiff further alleged inappropriate medical management with regard to Plaintiff’s airway in the PACU by the attending anesthesiologist and Plaintiff’s experts were prepared to offer opinions with regard to negligent re-intubation and oxygenation. There were additional allegations of missing equipment. Due to inadequate oxygenation, Plaintiff suffered a severe and permanent anoxic brain injury and is unable to care for himself independently, cannot walk and cannot communicate verbally. Following 24 hour nursing home care for the first year following the injury, Plaintiff is now cared for by his mother in her home full-time, with the assistance of home health care.

    Type of case: Medical Malpractice

    Injuries alleged: Permanent anoxic brain injury requiring a lifetime of care.

    Court: Settlement – case settled 3 ½ months prior to trial.

    Name of case: Confidential

    Verdict or settlement: Settlement

    Amount of settlement: $1,700,000

    Amount of specials: $670,000

    Date of settlement: August 2014

    Attorneys for plaintiff: Stephanie E. Grana,Irvin V. Cantor, Elliott M. Buckner, Cantor Stoneburner Ford Grana & Buckner, P.C., Richmond, Va.

    Read moreless
  • Motor Vehicle Accident

    $1.65 Million

    The plaintiff sustained a mild traumatic brain injury and injuries to her neck and shoulder in a motor vehicle accident. Plaintiff’s brain injury resulted in numerous deficits including problems with short-term memory, inattention, executive dysfunction and mood dysfunction including depression, apathy, and anxiety, all of which were further exacerbated due to chronic pain from the neck and shoulder injuries. Plaintiff was treated by a family physician who was prepared to testify that he knew plaintiff well before and after the subject accident and that plaintiff was a very different person after the accident. Plaintiff was also treated by a neuropsychiatrist, a neurologist, and a physiatrist.

    Type of action: Motor vehicle accident

    Injuries alleged: Mild traumatic brain injury; injuries to neck and shoulder

    Name of case: Confidential

    Verdict or settlement: Settlement

    Amount: $1,650,000

    Special damages: $80,000 in medical expenses; $160,000 in lost wages; disputed life care plan expenses

    Attorneys for plaintiff: Elliot M. Buckner, Irvin V. Cantor, and Stephanie E. Grana, Richmond, Va.

    This case result appeared in the 01.02.12 issue of Virginia Lawyers Weekly.

    Read moreless
  • Auto Accident

    $1.6 Million

    Automobile accident, involving mild brain injury suffered by our client.

    (Elliott Buckner, Irv Cantor, Stephanie Grana)

    Read moreless
  • Motor Vehicle Accident

    $1.51 Million

    The plaintiff, age 56, suffered an upper cervical fracture and mild brain injury in a motor vehicle collision. The plaintiff underwent cervical fusion surgery but continued to have pain after the operation.

    Plaintiff’s neurosurgeon referred the plaintiff to a psychiatrist, who prescribed a regimen of steroid injections and medications to manage her chronic pain.

    Several months after cervical surgery, the plaintiff continued to complain of memory loss and problems with concentration and attention. She was eventually diagnosed by a neurologist as having suffered a mild traumatic brain injury.

    The defense experts-a neurologist, psychiatrist and neuropsychologist-all took the position that the plaintiff had not suffered a brain injury in the collision and that her cognitive problems were all a result of a pre-existing narcotic dependence, developed as a result of unrelated gastrointestinal issues.

    (Irv Cantor, Stephanie Grana, Elliott Buckner)

    Read moreless
  • Motor Vehicle Accident

    $1.44 Million

    Motor vehicle collision injury case.

    (Irv Cantor, Stephanie Grana, Elliott Buckner).

    Read moreless
  • Wrongful Death

    $1.35 Million

    As of December 2012, the plaintiff, age 83, was a husband and primary caretaker to his wife of over 60 years and their mentally challenged adult son. He was a retired Air Force chaplain who had been awarded a Bronze Star for meritorious service in Vietnam and a retired community minister. Despite his age, plaintiff was a generally healthy and independent man who was responsible for shopping, preparing meals, housekeeping, laundry and transportation. Following a car accident that resulted in major front end damage to his vehicle, plaintiff was taken the emergency room. The x-ray report noted advanced degenerative changes with no fractures. Shortly thereafter, he was released home via a taxi. The next morning, plaintiff was unable to move his arms and legs. He was returned to the same emergency room and the CT revealed a transverse fracture through C6. Upon review, the fracture had been visible on the x-rays from the day before. Subsequent surgery was performed but plaintiff remained paralyzed. Plaintiff’s wife had to be moved to a nursing home on a permanent basis as her husband was unable to care for her. Plaintiff spent the next year enduring physical therapy and attempted recovery at various nursing homes, rehabilitation facilities and hospitals. Unfortunately, he was unable to fully recover from the injuries associated with the delayed diagnosis of his C6 fracture and resultant paralysis. He died just over one year after the initial emergency room admission and is survived by his wife and two adult children. Several sizeable liens existed as a result of plaintiff’s extensive medical care.

    Type of case: Wrongful Death/Medical Malpractice

    Injuries alleged: Delayed diagnosis of neck fracture resulting in improper hospital discharge and subsequent paralysis and death.

    Court: Settlement

    Verdict or settlement: Settlement

    Amount of settlement: $1,350,000

    Date of settlement: May 2015

    Attorneys for plaintiff: Stephanie E. Grana, Elliott M. Buckner, Irvin V. Cantor, Cantor Stoneburner Ford Grana & Buckner, P.C., Richmond, Va.

    Experts: Case settled before experts were named. Plaintiff’s experts included the specialties of radiology, emergency room medicine, pulmonology, critical care medicine and orthopedic spine surgery.

    Read moreless
  • Motor Vehicle Accident

    $1.3 Million

    Motor vehicle collision, in which an elderly couple suffered serious orthopedic injuries.

    (Stephanie Grana, Elliott Buckner, Irv Cantor)

    Read moreless
  • Motor Vehicle Accident

    $1.295 Million

    Motor vehicle collision injury case.

    (Irv Cantor, Stephanie Grana, Elliott Buckner)

    Read moreless
  • Medical Malpractice

    $1.25 Million

    Medical malpractice case, in which a 32 year old man suffered severe bowel injuries after a diagnostic procedure.

    (Lewis Stoneburner, Irv Cantor, Stephanie Grana)

    Read moreless
  • Medical Malpractice

    $1.25 Million

    Medical malpractice case, involving a death due to a medication overdose.

    (Stephanie Grana)

    Read moreless
  • Wrongful Death

    $1.14 Million

    Plaintiffs were the administrator and the family/beneficiaries of the estate of an 18 year old college student killed in a motor vehicle accident. The family secured a judgment against the driver of the car the decedent was riding in for $1,900,000. The present suit was a coverage case against the Commonwealth seeking satisfaction of the judgment pursuant to the Commonwealth’s Risk Management Plan. The case was very fact-specific and largely turned on agency issues. The case was vigorously defended by the Attorney General’s office. After more than a year of litigation and discovery the case settled approximately one month before trial.

    Type of Action: Coverage litigation after wrongful death verdict

    Style of Case: Confidential

    Court: Henrico County Circuit Court

    Award or Settlement: Settlement

    Amount: $1,140,000

    Amount of Specials: Underlying verdict of $1,900,000

    Attorneys for plaintiff: Irvin V. Cantor, Elliott M. Buckner and Stephanie E. Grana, Cantor Stoneburner Ford Grana & Buckner, P.C., Richmond, Va.

    Read moreless
  • Sexual Assault

    $1.125 Million

    Sexual assault case.

    (Aubrey Ford, Irv Cantor, Stephanie Grana)

    Read moreless
  • Sexual Assault

    $1.125 Million Settlement

    The case involved sexual assault in a workplace setting. The allegations included negligent hiring of an attendant.

    (Irv Cantor, Aubrey Ford, Stephanie Grana)

    Read moreless
  • Medical Malpractice

    $1.1 Million

    Plaintiff was a 54 year old female college professor without any history of urologic problems who underwent a craniotomy to resect a meningioma. Plaintiff tolerated the surgery well and a Foley remained in place. Nurses were to monitor Plaintiff’s input and output after the Foley was discontinued. The nursing notes were incomplete and void totals were not always recorded. Eventually, the Plaintiff was “straight-cathed” with a return of a large amount of urine. Despite the nursing monitoring, Plaintiff was again scanned and noted to have retention of over 1.5 liters of urine after a Foley was inserted. There was also a significant discrepancy between the recollection of the nurses and the Plaintiff and her husband. Plaintiff was discharged with a Foley in place. Despite follow-up care and time, Plaintiff’s overdistention bladder injury remained permanent. At present, Plaintiff remains unable to void on her own and must self-catheterize every 4 hours.

    Type of Action: Medical malpractice

    Injuries alleged: Permanent neurogenic bladder requiring a lifetime of self-catheterization

    Court: Case was settled pre-litigation

    Verdict or settlement: Settlement

    Date resolved: April 2013

    Amount: $1,100,000

    Attorneys for plaintiff: Stephanie E. Grana, Irvin V. Cantor, and Elliott Buckner, Cantor Stoneburner Ford Grana & Buckner, P.C., Richmond, Va.

    Read moreless
  • Wrongful Death

    $1.1 Million

    Wrongful death case arising from the death of an unmarried woman with one adult and one teenage child.

    (Irv Cantor, Elliott Buckner, Stephanie Grana)

    Read moreless
  • Brain Injury

    $1.025 Million

    Plaintiff was a 20 year old college student who suffered a traumatic brain injury in a motor vehicle collision in January, 2010 on Interstate 95 in Greensville County, Virginia. Plaintiff was a passenger in a car that collided with a tractor-trailer when the driver of the car changed lanes and lost control of his vehicle, resulting in a collision between the two vehicles. It was snowing at the time of the collision and the surface of the highway was slippery.

    As a result of his brain injury, the plaintiff was forced to miss one semester of college while he recuperated from his injuries. He returned to college and, after changing his major, graduated from college. Despite his successful completion of college, the plaintiff still suffered from sequelae of his brain injury that included: partial loss of hearing in one ear; sleep disorder; and some problems with concentration, attention, memory, and emotionality. Plaintiff’s incurred medical expenses were $214,967.05.

    Plaintiff brought suit against both the driver of his vehicle, who was a close friend, and the tractor-trailer driver and his employer. The parties each designated multiple experts to testify regarding the extent of the plaintiff’s brain injury. The case eventually settled at mediation a few weeks before trial for the total sum of $1,025,000, comprised of payments from the insurance carriers for both defendants.

    Type of Action: Traumatic Brain Injury - Tractor-Trailer Accident

    Style of case: Confidential

    Court: Greensville County Circuit Court

    Award or Settlement: Settlement

    Amount: $1,025,000

    Attorneys for plaintiff: Irvin V. Cantor, Elliott M. Buckner, and Stephanie E. Grana, Cantor, Stoneburner, Ford, Grana & Buckner, P.C., Richmond, Va.

    Read moreless
  • Medical Malpractice

    $1 Million

    Plaintiff, age 44, was married, a father of three young children and employed full time in a position that required travel across Virginia. He had a long history of minor neck pain for which he underwent conservative treatments, physical therapy and injections. Due to an exacerbation of symptoms, plaintiff was referred to a surgeon. A cervical MRI was done noting a herniated disc at C6-C7 with foraminal narrowing. Consequently, an anterior cervical decompression and fusion (“ACDF”) at C6-C7 was scheduled and performed in November 2012. The pre- and post-operative notes all indicated a surgical level of C6-C7. However, the radiology report for the C-spine following surgery described the surgical level as C7-T1. Plaintiff continued to treat with the defendant surgeon for 6 months and serial x-rays and an MRI were taken. Despite continued complaints of pain and headaches resistant to pain medication and physical therapy and follow-up x-rays continually reporting “status post ACDF from C7-T1”, the surgeon did not advise the plaintiff of any surgical complications or that he had operated at the wrong level. In late May 2013, the surgeon released plaintiff from his care advising him that there was nothing surgically wrong with his spine and that the pain had to be coming from something else.

    Plaintiff continued his use of pain medications, alternative methods of pain relief and limited his work and home activities. At one year out from surgery, plaintiff consulted with an orthopedic surgeon and an MRI was repeated which showed that the ACDF had been performed at C7-T1. Plaintiff reiterated that he had been advised that his surgery had been performed at the level of C6-C7. Unfortunately, the imaging studies also noted a central disc bulge at C6-C7 that was unchanged from 2012. Plaintiff had no choice but to undergo a second and more extensive spinal surgery in 2014 at C6-C7 with a posterior spinal fusion with instrumentation at C6-C7.

    Type of case: Medical Malpractice

    Injuries alleged: Wrong level spinal surgery resulting in second surgery and permanent injuries.

    Court: Settlement

    Verdict or settlement: Settlement

    Amount of settlement: $1,000,000

    Amount of specials: Approximately $225,000 related to second surgery.

    Date of settlement: January 2015

    Attorneys for plaintiff: Stephanie E. Grana, Irvin V. Cantor, Elliott M. Buckner, Cantor Stoneburner Ford Grana & Buckner, P.C., Richmond, Va.

    Read moreless
  • Medical Malpractice

    $1 Million

    As of 2009, plaintiff, a 51 year old insurance specialist, was suffering from an undiagnosed trigeminal schwannoma. In April 2009, she started to complain of blurred and double vision (diplopia), pressure behind the eyes and headaches. Based upon the initial evaluation by her ophthalmologist and 2 follow-up appointments, plaintiff was advised that she had adult strabismus and prism glasses were prescribed. Thyroid testing was negative. A cause of the diplopia was not determined. By March 2011, the vision difficulties and headaches had increased. Plaintiff returned to her ophthalmologist and was offered computer glasses. 8 days later, plaintiff was seen by her primary care physician with continued complaints and an MRI was finally ordered. Unfortunately, her trigeminal schwannoma had increased in size to 3.9 x 3.6 cm and was compressing the optic nerve. Tumor resection surgery was quickly performed in April 2011. Plaintiff suffers from 3rd, 4th and 5th cranial nerve deficits, constant diplopia in left eye with limited vision such that the left eyeglass is frosted, limited movement of left eye, ptosis of left upper eye lid, left sided neuropathic facial pain, left sided facial numbness, memory loss and profound fatigue.

    Type of case: Medical malpractice

    Court: Virginia

    Verdict or settlement: Settlement. Case settled 3 ½ months prior to trial.

    Date of settlement: October, 2013

    Amount: $1,000,000

    Amount of specials: $559,712.32 - Past medicals.

    Attorneys for plaintiff: Stephanie E. Grana, Irvin V. Cantor, and Elliott M. Buckner, Cantor Stoneburner Ford Grana & Buckner, P.C., Richmond, Va.

    Experts: Case settled before experts were named. Plaintiff’s experts included the specialties of pediatric ophthalmology, neurosurgery, neuropsychiatry and life care planning.

    Read moreless

Relentless Devotion. Proven Results.

    • Please enter your name.
    • Please enter your phone number.
      This isn't a valid phone number.
    • Please enter your email address.
      This isn't a valid email address.
    • Please make a selection.
    • Please enter a message.
Put Us On Your Side